How Can a Divine Revelation Be Defective?
by The Seer
[In response to this comment]
Proud Teacher, I really appreciate you responding to the criticisms in a civil manner and your respect for the criticisms. You represent a point of view I myself possessed until a few months ago.
Now let me respond to your comment.
“But, I would like to ask you a simple question, have you seen any bad or wrong in Guruji or his intention.”
I’m not sure if you have read all the posts in this blog. Yes, there are too many and it’s not possible to read everything, but you should at least read all the recommended posts you’ll find the links in the sidebar. You’ll find people asking all kinds of questions about Guruji’s intention and there has never been a satisfactory response.
One question that everyone asks is regarding the financial aspect of the organization. Why does AoL claim to be a non-profit org while it really operates business like? And where does all the money go? Why is it so very difficult to trace the money trail of an org that claims to be non-profit?
But I don’t want to go into the financial allegations, I’ll discuss something that’s very obvious . Please read my previous comment here and I’d appreciate if you can share your views.
I have something to say about the Sudarshan Kriya and the way it is ‘given’ to people, I’d really appreciate if you can sincerely discuss about this as an individual, thinking for yourself, not going by what you have been told by the org.
In SKY, I know few people have faced problem due to this, hence the tape itself has revamped three times from the inception.
From what you say it’s obvious that the original version of SK is defective. Now, the AoL says the SK has been divinely revealed to SSRS. How can a divine revelation be defective? And can a divine revelation be revamped and progressive versions be released? From what you say, it’s possible that the current version too could be defective and maybe this version too will have an upgrade. Don’t you think it’s unethical to offer a possibly defective process to people who come with high hopes that their problems would be healed?
While SK could be problematic in some cases, I’ll admit it does solve many health issues, I myself have experienced that and have seen a number of people benefit. It’s good if it’s ‘taught’ to people so that they can do it themselves. But it’s not really ‘taught’ to people, I feel there is something very wrong in that it can by practiced only by listening to a tape. Even doing it by listening to the tape once or twice is okay, but if someone feels the need to do it every single week by going to a follow-up class and listening to a tape, they are hooked, they are bound, there is something seriously wrong with this approach. You are really not freeing people from their problems, you are only binding them more.
And haven’t you read in the posts from this blog and elsewhere in the internet that SK is similar if not same as hyperventilation? What do you say about this?
You know, when you live breathe AoL and spend a lot of time in AoL circles, it’s very easy to conclude the criticisms are unfair. I recommend you take a break and spend sometime completely away from the AoL, maybe 3 months, or at least one month. You will begin to see that it’s not what you believed it to be, you’ll get a completely different picture. We are not forcing you to take our point of view. Take a break, look at the whole thing with a different perspective and decide for yourself.